Enjoyed this ludic metaphor in Neal Lawson's column for the Guardian today on the bigger perspective of comprehensive education:
Education is about more than churning out efficient workers. It's not just what job we want but what kind of world we want to create. Children need the skills not just to play the game but the knowledge to change the rules.
But New Labour embraces a grim view of change in which people only respond to targets or competition. There is no space for consensus, cooperation or caring. Capitalism isn't on the national curriculum, but the education system rigorously prepares the minds of our children for it.
In short, they need an education for the infinite game - where the point is to keep changing the rules of play in society, in order that better games, with more participants, can emerge - rather than for the finite game of produce-and-compete-to-consume-and-display. (See James Carse, and the Play Ethic book, for more).
Recent Comments